As you probably know, both the House and Senate have passed tax reform bills. Whether the two bills will be able to be harmonized and passed into law remains to be seen. Both bills include changes that will have a significant impact on a public company’s ability to deduct compensation paid to top executives in years 2018 and beyond, as described below.
Under current law (Code Section 162(m)), a public company’s deduction for compensation that it pays to its CEO and three highest officers by pay (determined on the last day of a company’s fiscal year), other than the CFO, is limited to $1,000,000 per covered employee per tax year. This deduction limit does not apply to “performance-based compensation”, such as stock options or cash or equity awards that tie vesting or payout to achievement of financial performance criteria, and because of the performance-based compensation exception many public companies are never impacted by the deduction limit even though they may pay compensation well in excess of $1,000,000 per year to one or more executives. Both the House and Senate tax reform bills include elimination of the performance-based compensation exception to the $1,000,000 limit on the tax deduction for tax years beginning in 2018 and later. Both bills also pull compensation paid to the CFO and any employee who was the CEO, CFO or one of the three highest paid employees for any taxable year after 2016 (even if he or she is no longer in that group in a future year) into the $1,000,000 deduction limit. These changes mean that it will likely cost companies more in 2018 and beyond to pay the same executive compensation that they are paying now and that deductibility of payments made to former employees after termination, such as severance or deferred compensation payments, could also be restricted by the $1,000,000 limit.
There is one significant difference between the two bills that the conference committee will have to resolve — the Senate bill grandfathers future compensation paid under a written binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017 and the House bill includes no such grandfathering. At this point, there is no indication of which provision is likely to prevail in the reconciliation process.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.