The summer yielded mixed economic signals for the auto industry. On the plus side, U.S. unemployment rates and interest rates remain low. However, auto sales at several auto manufacturers, including Ford and GM, slipped in July. Analysts are also focusing on an increasing area of concern: auto loan delinquencies. Earlier this year, the total amount of auto loans topped $1 trillion. Subprime (FICO score of 600 or lower) auto loans make up approximately one fifth of auto loans. Those loans are starting to see marked increases in delinquencies. Delinquencies of at least 60 days in subprime auto loans climbed to 4.59% in July, an increase in 13 percent compared to June and 17 percent higher than a year ago Prime auto loan delinquencies also jumped up to 0.4%, which is 21% higher than a year ago.
At least some analysts have raised concerns about the impact of auto loan delinquencies on the industry and the broader economy. In June, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon warned that the auto loan market was “a little stressed” and projected future losses for lenders in that industry. The Wall Street Journal also credited the record-breaking auto sales of 2015, at least in part, to the historical rise in auto loans, and predicted a negative impact on sales if auto lenders become stretched with delinquencies. Car and Driver similarly noted the rise in auto loan delinquencies and warned that any collapse in the subprime market would “choke” the car market.
The rise in delinquencies is now being felt in the auto industry. GM and Ford both set aside more for credit losses in the first half of 2016 than during the same period in 2015. Ford also acknowledged that rising delinquencies, along with other factors, would make the second half of 2016 more difficult for the company. In light of the other positive economic indicators, whether the subprime market continues on its current trajectory remains to be seen.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.