It is hard to believe that just two years ago, it was news that so many auto companies were attending the Consumer Electronics Show (CES). In contrast, last week’s 2016 CES show featured a full 25% of its keynote speakers from car companies. The Wall Street Journal went so far as to proclaim that “Driverless Cars Steal the Show.” As the 2016 North American International Auto Show kicks off this week, it’s worth reflecting on what this convergence of auto and technology means for the industry.
Is automotive dominating technology, or is technology swallowing automotive? Will your children drive a GM-badged vehicle, or a Google-badged vehicle? It seems to us that the acquisition of one of the automotive suppliers by a technology company is a matter of when, not if. Smart suppliers will be ready.
As we discussed just last week, car sales hit an all-time high in 2015: 17.5 million vehicles. While that number sounds amazingly large, especially compared with 10.4 million vehicles in 2009, just how big is it? After all, this all-time high is just a fraction of smartphone sales. Add in tablets, wearables, etc. and just how big is the automotive industry compared to technology? Moreover, there is the daily encroachment on the automotive industry by companies like Google, Apple and others.
For years, when we discussed the “Automotive Industry,” the conversation almost exclusively revolved around the companies that make cars and their suppliers – the bread and butter of the industry. This automotive/technology convergence trend makes us wonder if that bread and butter may just be shifting with the wave of the future.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.