A number of amendments to Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) went into effect in many states on July 1, 2013. Similar amendments are pending in a number of other states. These amendments include several changes that have a significant impact on the search and file process for purposes of perfecting a security interest under the UCC.
While there are a number of changes, of particular significance are revisions addressing the “correct” name of an individual debtor or an organization for purposes of a financing statement (UCC Section 9-503). As to individual debtors, the amendments as adopted, or in some cases proposed, by the states are not uniform. Thus, depending on which amendments have been or are adopted in a particular state, there may be variations that could apply depending on which state’s law controls perfection of the security interest. In light of these changes, the actual form of financing statement has also been revised for use in many states (but not all) as of July 1, 2013 (e.g. some states will no longer require organization type and id number to be included in the form), but the forms are not uniform among the states. There are other changes as well (including but not limited to UCC Section 9-102(a)(68) re “public organic record”; Section 9-516 regarding the information required on a financing statement; and with respect to a correction statements (called an “information statement” under the amendments) filed under Section 9-518 of the UCC.
As of this date, approximately 45 states have adopted amendments that were effective July 1, 2013, with legislation pending in other states. As the amendments to Article 9 as adopted are not uniform, specific state statutes should be reviewed as applicable.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.