On August 5, two Denso Corp executives were sentenced to over a year in prison following their guilty plea to participating in a conspiracy to fix prices in violation of the antitrust laws. Yuji Suzuki, a former senior manager in the Toyota Parts Division, was sentenced to 16 months in prison and Hiroshi Watanabe, a former group leader in the same division, was sentenced to 15 months. Their conspiracy to rig bids and fix prices involved electronic control units and heater control panels sold to Toyota Motor Company. Their part in the conspiracy spanned 3 years.
Previously, two other Denso executives have plead guilty to antitrust violations. Norihiro Imai, a former assistant manager of the Toyota Sales Division, was sentenced to 12 months and one day in prison and a $20,000 fine and Makoto Hattori was sentenced to 14 months in prison and a $20,000 fine. In addition, Denso agreed to pay $78 million in 2012 to settle the antitrust investigation of the company.
Indeed, the auto parts antitrust investigation has spawned a number of criminal prosecutions of individuals. For example, six Yazaki executives were criminally prosecuted receiving sentences ranging from 14-24 months in prison and fines of $20,000 each and three Furukawa Electric executives were criminally prosecuted and received sentences ranging from 12-18 months in prison and a fine of $20,000 each. To date, the DOJ has garnered guilty pleas from nine companies and 14 executives.
The DOJ views the prosecution of individuals as one of its best weapons to deter unlawful conduct. Companies act through their executives and in cases where the companies have the ability to pay hefty fines, the threat of prison sentences against individuals may be a much bigger stick. Attorneys representing individuals in these cases need to be mindful of this policy incentive. And, companies under investigation, need to get separate counsel for their individual executives at the first sign that they may have engaged in wrongful conduct. Such action will protect both the company and its individual executives.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.